Leukômata: 40% of grade. You will write 10 leukômata, 375-word response papers; how long is 375 words? Roughly this long. We shall discuss the assignments in greater detail in class.
- leukôma α: Free Write: What was the most surprising thing that you learned about Athenian law from MacDowell's handbook? If your roommate asked you to give an account of the coolest, weirdest, most interesting, or boring, or shocking thing you've encountered so far, what would you say? Your writing must be intelligible, but it need not be formal. The only requirement is that you type and keep typing, without pause, for 30 minutes. Then, turn it what comes out!
- leukôma β:You vs Text [Identify at least two things from our readings that have struck you as interesting, surprising, odd, difficult to understand--anything that really caught your interest for any reason (cite specific passages please). This exercise asks what seems interesting, in one or more texts, in the light of what you think or know. Feel free to circle or otherwise highlight the sentence or clause that contains the crux of your observation.]
- leukôma γ: You vs Text
- leukôma δ:Text vs Text. [Read at least two readings or passages against each other. How does the one illuminate, contradict, agree with, flesh out, etc. the other? So, say one speech runs a particular legal (or extra-legal) argument with which another speech disagrees in some specific way. What do we learn from that? Base your observations on at least 2 specific passages (or phenomena). Feel free to circle or otherwise highlight the sentence or clause that contains the crux of your idea/observation. This exercise asks what seems interesting, in one or more texts, in the light of what one or more other texts say. You might observe, for example, that in one text a litigant casts tax obligations as a forced intrusion on freedom while elsewhere another frames them as voluntary and honor-bearing; you might, then, speculate how it is that we see this difference of opinion. In doing so you are ineffect asserting that one passage speaks to another in an interesting way. You do not need to mount a full-bore argument; you do not need to 'discover' anything new. You simply need to have an honest thought born of careful reading.]
- leukôma ε: Text vs Text
- leukôma ϛ: Text vs Text
- leukôma ζ: Text vs Text
- leukôma η: Text vs Context [Read this week's selections against the semester's readings and discussions. This exercise asks what seems interesting, in one or more texts, in the light of your increasingly evidence-based knowledge and understanding of Athenian law. Perhaps you have noticed a theme, rhetorical strategy, legal or procedural phenomenon that appears in multiple sources: here is your chance to string a few of those multiple observations together. So, you might observe, for example, that a number of texts speak in some particular way to an aspect of law regarding the family. In so doing you are in effect asserting that a number of passages speak to some larger issue, which might not even be an ancient category of thought.]
- leukôma θ: Text vs Context
- leukôma ι: Text vs Context
Assessing the leukômata. Each leukôma will be assessed on a five-point scale:
- 11 points: On-time delivery of 375 words. Writing shows little engagement with the texts and/or is so unclearly written as to render assessment of such impossible. [ = words]
- 12 points: Writing is clear, but it shows engagement only inasmuch as it recapitulates prior classroom discussion; it is clear but does not take ownership of any ideas. [ = words + alien thought]
- 13 points: Writing is clear and contains 1 good, clear, interesting idea of your own devising. [ = words + an idea]
- 14 points: Writing is clear and contains at least 2 good, clear, interesting ideas of your own devising [ = words + ideas]
- 15 points: Writing is clear, compelling, well-crafted, and efficient, and contains at least 2 good, clear, interesting and connected ideas of your own devising [ = words and ideas are as one]
This will generate not the grade, but a figure from which to calculate one; growth and improvement count.
40% of grade; this is a seminar, a biggish one, but a seminar nevertheless; I provide framework, background,
readings, occasional presentations and lectures, but you are responsible
for discussion. On any given day your primary responsibility is
to come prepared to attack the day's readings with questions, comments,
problems, counter-arguments, parallels, etc.
- See me: I am your biggest supporter. If for some reason you feel uncomfortable talking in class, come see me right away. We'll see what we can do to help you feel more at ease.
sources: Primary sources assigned for
this class are to be read in translation. But don't let me off the hook. You will develop an eye for the sorts of question that must be answered in full or part on consultation of the original language. When you have a question about this sort of thing, ask ask ask. I'll bring my laptop; we can look things up if it will help drive the discussion forward!
- Discussion: I expect you to root your contributions
in specific passages in the readings. Point to specifics.
Be prepared to explain yourself with close reference to texts.
I encourage you to bring up passages that you do not understand
(chances are someone else, myself included, is similarly confused!),
but I expect you to be able to describe the scope and dimension
of your confusion: "The litigant's claim X at passage A
seems to contradict his assertion Y at passage B in these
2 ways; I don't get it." On any given day our job is to bring these 2000-year-old texts to life in the light of the other texts we've read, of ideas we've developed in our leukômata, of thoughts we've floated in discussion, of ideas others have had in discussion. We shall move forward by reading carefully and across the syllabus, by listening to each other, and by throwing as many ideas as we can against the wall and seeing how many stick.
- Contribution: I value and reward hard work and careful thought. You do not need to know anything about Greek history or about law to be a valuable contributor to this class! I expect you to work hard to master
the materials that we cover, to think carefully about what we read, listen carefully to your peers in discussion, and have fun while doing so! Anything else you know from outside this class is gravy. Never let your fear
that someone else might know more than you keep you from speaking
in class. In this setting, how you think will often mean more than what you know.
- Assessment: After class each day I shall note your performance for the day and then give you a grade for each week of discussion:
- 4 : you are on fire, offering a number of solid points or, possibly, one or a couple really great points
- 3 : you are working up a sweat, offering a few points or, possibly, one quite strong one
- 2 : you are warming up, offering 1 solid contribution to the discussion
- 1 : you are on the bench, present but not contributing
This will generate not the grade, but a figure from which to calculate one; growth and improvement count. Roughly speaking, 1=75:C, 2=82:B-, 3=89:B+, 4=99:A+. I shall drop the 2 lowest days; any absences, beyond 2, will be recorded as 0 in the daily note.
Data Dump: 20% of grade; there will be one test in this class. 1 hr.; closed book; take home. This test is designed simply
to let you show that you have sufficiently mastered the basics, so that you will be able to have
fun with the primary sources that we shall study throughout the rest of the semester. The
test will cover Hansen, The Athenian Democracy ch3 and MacDowell, The Law in Classical Athens ch1-6, 10-11, 13-16. Format will be short answer / multiple
choice. No tricks. The first five full days of class we shall walk through the assigned chapters very carefully so that we all build a solid foundation for further discussion. The logic of this exercise is to frontload the hard work of memorizing facts in the first few days of class, in order to allow scope for letting the discussion of primary sources take us wherever we like! I shall hand out the test in class Wed 1 Feb. You will be on your honor to: (1) leave the test in its envelope until you are ready to take it, (2) discuss the test with no one else after either of you has taken it (3), spend no more than 75 minutes taking the test; (4) use no books, notes, websites, or any other aids in the taking of the test.